Type distribution
1.94%As of August 5, 2026
The first letters form your type code · neither pole is better than the other
These four axes follow structures established in political science · see how we measure →
Values markets, growth, and free competition
You believe the free activity of individuals and businesses grows society as a whole. Competition and achievement deserve fair rewards, and state intervention should stop at what is truly necessary. You cherish self-reliance and the vitality of markets. The balance is complete when you also consider how to embrace those left behind by competition.
Values international cooperation, openness, and global solidarity
You see opportunity in cooperation and exchange across borders. Problems like climate and migration can't be solved by one country alone, and you stay open to other cultures and backgrounds. A broad view and a sense of solidarity are your strengths. Your ideals become even sturdier when you also mind the practical interests your own country faces.
Values social order, safety, and the authority of the state
You value a society that runs safely and in good order. To protect the community, you accept a degree of discipline and strong public authority, and you treasure a sense of stability. Respect for responsibility and norms is your strength. You become even sturdier by watching that individual rights are not crushed along the way.
Values change, diversity, and reform
You believe society needs change and reform to keep improving. You stay open to new values and diverse ways of living, and you listen to the voices of minorities and the vulnerable. Openness and inclusion are your strengths. Your changes last longer when you don't rush and also see what should be kept.
A fun look at real historical figures mapped onto the four axes — not an academic classification
He swept away hundreds of tariffs and repealed the Corn Laws at the cost of splitting his own party, settled border disputes with America by negotiation instead of war, founded London's modern police to secure public order — and, holding that proven abuses must be corrected, chose practical reform over party doctrine, twice.
Painting: Henry William Pickersgill, c. 1851 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons
Through free trade and openness he lifted a small port city into a global economic power, and with strict order and strong government transformed his nation within a single generation — a pragmatist architect.
Photo: Robert D. Ward, U.S. Department of Defense, 2002 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons
A society where what's good ultimately gets through, and what isn't doesn't, no matter how it's packaged. Where real results are recognized over good intentions, fast execution over long argument, and where that execution comes with clear authority and clear responsibility.
Underneath these hopes is a sense that the market is the most honest test, and that the method that works is already out there somewhere. So this stance trusts proven results and quick execution more than heated debate. But there's a price: the fastest route is plain to see, while people take time to be persuaded — so this stance always has to find its answer between speed and consent.
Overall, you lean toward neither side. You weigh progressive and conservative values issue by issue, caring more about substance than camps.
Across the four axes: progressive 2 · conservative 2 — it can differ by axis.
The progressive–conservative label is a rough guide based on how this test defines its axes.
