Type distribution
3.23%As of August 5, 2026
The first letters form your type code · neither pole is better than the other
These four axes follow structures established in political science · see how we measure →
Values distribution, equality, and public redistribution
You care about society prospering together. As much as what markets produce, you watch whether the fruits are shared fairly, and you believe the state should firmly support those in difficulty. You read a society's maturity in how wide its shared safety net is. Your vision becomes even more persuasive when funding and efficiency are considered alongside it.
Values national sovereignty, identity, and interest
You think of your country's interest and identity before anything else. Protecting sovereignty and security comes before the demands of the international community, and you treasure what has long been kept. Realism and a sense of responsibility are your strengths. Since closing too many doors can mean missed opportunities, flexibility to open up when needed helps too.
Values social order, safety, and the authority of the state
You value a society that runs safely and in good order. To protect the community, you accept a degree of discipline and strong public authority, and you treasure a sense of stability. Respect for responsibility and norms is your strength. You become even sturdier by watching that individual rights are not crushed along the way.
Values change, diversity, and reform
You believe society needs change and reform to keep improving. You stay open to new values and diverse ways of living, and you listen to the voices of minorities and the vulnerable. Openness and inclusion are your strengths. Your changes last longer when you don't rush and also see what should be kept.
A fun look at real historical figures mapped onto the four axes — not an academic classification
He put land in the hands of ordinary families with the Homestead Act and declared that labor comes before capital, shielded his nation's industry with protective tariffs — and with strong federal authority in wartime drove through the great reform of abolishing slavery.
Photo: Alexander Gardner, 1863 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons
He built livelihoods on a state-led economy and never compromised on full independence — and with strong leadership drove through sweeping reforms of script, education, and secularization.
Photo: Unknown author, 1932 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons
A society where an ordinary person's life rests not on the luck of meeting good people, but on rules and institutions that keep working even when the people change. Where a worn-out institution is remade by our own hands — properly, not halfway — and where the rules we set are kept by everyone, with no cutting in line.
Underneath these hopes is a conviction that well-built institutions protect people better than individual goodwill. So this stance trusts reform that sets a direction and carries it through, more than a compromise that fizzles out. But there's a tension: deciding together, with everyone taking part, and driving through a direction judged to be right — this stance has to keep finding the balance between those two.
Overall, you lean toward neither side. You weigh progressive and conservative values issue by issue, caring more about substance than camps.
Across the four axes: progressive 2 · conservative 2 — it can differ by axis.
The progressive–conservative label is a rough guide based on how this test defines its axes.
